Teach the question, not the answer
Why enquiry-led humanities — starting with the argument, not the fact — produces both better thinkers and better board results.
Read note →15 years teaching the humanities — History, Political Science, Geography and Literature — as one connected enquiry into how people live, decide and remember. I teach students to argue from evidence, write with a point of view, and see the threads that run between a war, a constitution, a coastline and a poem.
I read History at university and kept trespassing into geography, politics and literature because the interesting questions never respected the boundaries between them. That trespassing became my teaching: I hold a PGT brief across the humanities and treat it as a feature, not a compromise, because the subjects genuinely explain one another.
Fifteen years in, my students consistently top the board in the social sciences, but the result I value is the argument. They leave able to read a source critically, hold a position, and write it down with structure and voice — skills that outlast every syllabus. Over fifty have gone on to read history, law, political science and literature at university.
If your school wants a humanities teacher who can take any of the social sciences to the top of the board, connect them into one coherent enquiry, and teach students to actually think — my record and references are ready. Give me the class that finds these subjects boring; the boredom is a teaching problem, and I enjoy solving it.
History to geography, civics to literature — the humanities taught as one conversation about people.
The humanities get taught as things to memorise — dates, capitals, articles of the constitution — and students conclude the subjects are dull because we've hidden the argument inside them. Every humanities topic is really a question people disagreed about: why empires fall, who power belongs to, how place shapes a people. I teach the question, not just the answer, so students learn to think and argue — and, almost incidentally, to write the kind of answers that top the board.
Teach History and Political Science to classes 11–12 and coordinate the humanities across the senior school. Maintain a 95% board pass rate, run the MUN and debate programme, and have guided fifty-plus students into humanities and law degrees.
Taught History and Geography to senior classes; built the source-based and map-work revision system credited with the department's strong board results.
Taught integrated social science across middle and early-senior school — the grounding that taught me to connect the disciplines rather than silo them.
Why enquiry-led humanities — starting with the argument, not the fact — produces both better thinkers and better board results.
Read note →How I connect history, geography, civics and literature so each illuminates the others instead of competing for memory.
Read note →The single skill that unlocks every humanities board paper: a thesis, evidence, a view. How I teach students to structure one.
Read note →She made History my daughter's favourite subject by teaching it as a set of arguments, not a list of dates. Scored 97, chose to read law.
ParentCLASS 12 · CBSEKavya coordinates our entire humanities faculty and lifts everyone's standard. She thinks across subjects in a way that's genuinely rare.
PrincipalVIBGYOR HIGHI do a history degree now because of the way she taught us to read a source and take a position. She taught thinking, not cramming.
RheaFORMER STUDENT